WP 2010-5 Institutions, Aggregate Demand and Cross-Country Employment Performance: Alternative Theoretical Perspectives and the Evidence
David Howell ()
No 2010-5, SCEPA working paper series. from Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School
In New Classical and New Keynesian thinking, the cross-country pattern of unemployment reflects prevailing equilibrium rates, which in turn are mainly explained by the protective labor market institutions that produce market rigidities. While this orthodox view has framed nearly all of the research that has addressed this issue, the evidence to date is not very compelling; recent work in the Keynesian tradition suggests that more attention should be paid to capital accumulation and monetary/fiscal policy. The central claim of this paper is that a still richer account requires embedding the Keynesian account in a comparative political economy framework to explain both levels of aggregate demand and the translation of demand to employment (and unemployment).
Keywords: unemployment; labor demand; employment; aggregate demand; Keynesian (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/scepa/public ... Howell_WP_2010-5.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epa:cepawp:2010-5
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SCEPA working paper series. from Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bridget Fisher ().