Is the European EConomy a Patient and the Union its Doctor? On Jobs and Growth in Europe

Sjef Ederveen, Albert Van der Horst () and Paul Tang
Additional contact information
Paul Tang: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis

No 35, Economics Working Papers from European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes

Abstract: A stronger focus on jobs and growth is part of an effort to renew the Lisbon strategy. Yet the view that economic expansion contributes to maintaining Lisbon’s other goals of social cohesion as well as the environment is somewhat optimistic. First, there are structural trade-offs among the central elements of the Lisbon strategy. Escaping these trade-offs temporarily is sometimes possible but requires policy changes. Second, higher productivity (growth) may not provide more structural room for governments to manoeuvre. It leads to higher tax receipts but also to higher public expenditures since public sector wages and social security benefits are linked to productivity. In contrast, more employment (jobs) is associated with a smaller public sector. But to engineer the increase in employment, changes in welfare state arrangements are needed. In other words, focussing solely on the sick child will probably harm the other children. Looking back, employment has kept expanding in the European Union whereas the productivity growth rate has been falling. The latter is not easily explained by (falling) investment in knowledge. Instead, the current relatively low productivity growth rate largely reflects success in the past. Many European countries have caught up with the United States, having seen comparatively fast employment growth in the late 1990s. Looking forward, we argue that the combination of the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) with national action plans, the way the EU wants to achieve its goals, is both too little and too much: European interference with national employment polices has a weak basis, while the OMC may not provide member states with a strong enough commitment to pursue an innovation agenda.

Keywords: Jobs and growth; Lisbon agenda; productivity slowdown; Open Method of Coordination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F15 F21 F43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2005-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.enepri.org/Publications/WP035.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epr:enepwp:035

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
ENEPRI c/o CEPS Place du Congrès 1 1000 Brussels Belgium
http://www.enepri.org

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Papers from European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes ENEPRI c/o CEPS Place du Congrès 1 1000 Brussels Belgium. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPS ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).