Fairness Opinions and Capital Markets: Evidence from Germany, Switzerland and Austria

Sebasian Lobe and Nils-Christian Schenk

ECMI Papers from Centre for European Policy Studies

Abstract: This paper provides the first empirical evidence of fairness opinions in Europe. Legal requirements concerning the use of fairness opinions in mergers and acquisitions are significantly different in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. We examine the determinants of fairness opinions for target firms in these various regulatory settings, and moreover, investigate the impact of such opinions on the abnormal returns of target firms. While in Germany and Austria market participants do not deem fairness opinions important, they do create value for shareholders in Switzerland. Because conflicts of interest between the target’s board and bidder are a main determinant of fairness opinions in Switzerland, we conclude that when the target’s management faces such conflict, external expert advice replaces the board’s opinion on the offer.

Pages: 18 pages
Date: 2009-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ceps.eu/system/files/book/1773.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.ceps.eu/system/files/book/1773.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/book/1773.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eps:ecmiwp:1596

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ECMI Papers from Centre for European Policy Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Margarita Minkova ().