Democratic constitution-making - Reflections on the European experiment

John Erik Fossum and Agustín José Menéndez

No 18, ARENA Working Papers from ARENA

Abstract: Laeken has ushered in the first continent-wide debate, on the issue of a European constitution. An important question is whether this amounts to Europe’s constitutional moment in a critical normative sense. To address this we first distil out five core lessons from the Laeken experience. This serves to clarify which normative standards are relevant through reconstruction of those that actually informed the process. We find that the standards from normative theory are adequate, but that the complex European setting and experience throw up several thorny issues pertaining to how such a process can be organised, so as to comply with democratic norms, and whether it at all can be deemed to be representative. Our concern here is to shed light on how the tension between the idea of a constitutional moment and the notion of democratic representation can be resolved. To this end we develop a normative model of deliberative constitution making. This article has later been published in Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft Vol.34. No.3, pp.249-262

Keywords: deliberative democracy; Constitution for Europe; constitution building (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-05-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2005/papers/05_18.xml Full text (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:arenax:p0198

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ARENA Working Papers from ARENA
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sindre Eikrem Hervig ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).