Political leadership and bureaucratic autonomy. Effects of agencification
Morten Egeberg and
Jarle Trondal
No 9, ARENA Working Papers from ARENA
Abstract:
Previous studies have shown that agencification tends to undermine political control within a government portfolio. However, doubts have been raised as regards the robustness of these findings. In this paper we document that agency officials pay significantly less attention to signals from executive politicians than their counterparts within ministerial (cabinet-level) departments. This finding holds when we control for variation in tasks, the political salience of issue areas and officials’ rank. Simultaneously we observe that the three control variables all have an independent effect on officials’ attentiveness to a steer from above. In addition we find that the more organisational capacity available within the respective ministerial departments, the more agency personnel tend to assign weight to signals from the political leadership. We apply large-N questionnaire data at three points in time; spanning two decades and shifting administrative doctrines. A later version of this article was published in Governance, Vol. 22, No. 4, October 2009, pp. 673-688
Keywords: agency theory; organization theory; organization theory; Norway; political science; public administration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-06-30
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/public ... pers2009/WP09_09.xml Full text (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:arenax:p0297
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ARENA Working Papers from ARENA
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sindre Eikrem Hervig ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).