Commitment Decisions under Art. 9 of Regulation 1/2003: The Developing EC Practice and Case Law
Heike Schweitzer
No 22, EUI-LAW Working Papers from European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law
Abstract:
The so-called commitment decision procedure, introduced into European competition law with Art. 9 of Regulation 1/2003, was meant to provide the Commission with the possibility to dispose of competition law cases by way of a kind of formal settlement, roughly analogous to the US consent decree. It has quickly become an important instrument of European competition law enforcement. Since May 2004, roughly 50 % of all Commission decisions applying Art. 81 or Art. 82 in non-hardcore-cartel cases have been taken under Art. 9 of Reg. 1/2003. However, the CFI’s Alrosa judgment of 11 July 2007 calls into question the Commission’s commitment decision practice in various respects. Alrosa does not conceive commitment decisions as settlements proper, but treats them as public law enforcement largely analogous to infringement decisions under Art. 7 of Reg. 1/2003. It emphasizes the Commission’s duty to investigate and clearly formulate the competitive concern, insists on a full judicial review of the proportionality of the commitments and underlines the full judicial protection of the concerned undertakings’ procedural rights, namely the right to access to the file and the right to be heard. This paper provides an overview of the Commission’s commitment decision practice since Art. 9 of Reg. 1/2003 has entered into force, discusses the concerns that this practice has raised and the implications of the Alrosa judgment, should it be upheld by the ECJ. According to the author, the Alrosa judgment fundamentally re-conceptualizes the function and structure of commitment decision procedures, with likely repercussions on analogous provisions in national competition laws. It creates important safeguards against the real risk that the Commission’s incentives to settle cases may diverge from the public interest in effective protection of competition.
Keywords: European law; competition policy; European Court of Justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-10-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/1814/9449 Full text (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:euilaw:p0113
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in EUI-LAW Working Papers from European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Machteld Nijsten ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).