Making a common foreign policy: EU coordination in the ILO

Marianne Riddervold

No 18, RECON Online Working Papers Series from RECON

Abstract: This article contributes to the debate on how we can understand the increasingly high level of common EU foreign policies despite this being the policy area where one would expect the EU members to be least willing to agree to policies that depart from their national self-interests. This is done through a core study of EU coordination towards the ILO Maritime Labour Convention (MLC). The question posed is how we can explain that the EU reached agreement on common positions in all areas of the MLC despite their initially diverging preferences. To account for this, I draw on Habermas’ theory of communicative action. The analysis suggests that common EU policies were the results not of exchanging threats and promises, but of different types of learning on the basis of reason-giving. Despite what we conventionally assume, the EU members not only adjust their preferences as part of the bargaining game, but also change them on the basis of arguments perceived as legitimate

Keywords: CFSP/ESDP; ILO; legitimacy; national interest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-12-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0918.pdf?fileitem=5456592 Full text (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:reconx:p0057

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RECON Online Working Papers Series from RECON
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marit Eldholm ().