Outsourcing Versus Foreign Direct Investment: A Welfare Analysis
Arti Grover
Working Papers from eSocialSciences
Abstract:
Foreign direct investment may not necessarily be the most welfare enhancing form of international investment. The host country may avail options like – Joint venture, technology licensing, franchising, outsourcing etc. A host country’s choice of organizational form should depend on its growth and welfare effects. This paper compares the welfare effects of FDI with that of outsourcing in the host country using Grossman-Helpman quality ladders framework. If the host absorptive capacity is above a threshold level, outsourcing is more welfare enhancing vis-à -vis FDI; while even with lower than threshold absorptive capacity, outsourcing being welfare improving over FDI is not ruled out. [Working Paper No. 140]
Keywords: outsourcing; foreign direct investment; absorptive capacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-10
Note: Institutional Papers
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownl ... &AId=3010&fref=repec
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Unavailable
Related works:
Working Paper: Outsourcing Versus Foreign Direct Investment--A Welfare Analysis (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:3010
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from eSocialSciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Padma Prakash ().