Loans or Grants?

Daniel Cohen, Pierre Jacquet and Helmut Reisen

Working Papers from eSocialSciences

Abstract: In this paper they argue that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. Debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than either loans or grants taken in isolation. The core of the intuition, which they develop in a simple two-period model, relates to the fact that the poorest countries are also the most volatile, so that contingent facilities, explicitly incorporating debt cancellation mechanisms, are a valuable instrument. [Discussion Paper No. 2007/06]

Keywords: grants; loans; developing countries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-11
Note: Institutional Papers
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownl ... &AId=3218&fref=repec
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Unavailable

Related works:
Journal Article: Loans or Grants? (2007)
Working Paper: Loans or Grants (2007)
Working Paper: Loans o Grants? (2007)
Working Paper: Loans o Grants? (2007)
Working Paper: Loans or Grants? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:3218

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from eSocialSciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Padma Prakash ().