Quality of Official Development Assistance Assessment

Nancy Birdsall, Homi Kharas (), Ayah Mahgoub and Rita Perakis

Working Papers from eSocialSciences

Abstract: In 2010, many questions have come up regarding the actual practices of different donors— those over which they have control and those that are likely to affect their long-run effectiveness in terms of development impact. This report addresses these largely neglected questions and helps fill the research gap by focusing on what might be called aid agency effectiveness, or what is called as the quality of aid. A Quality of Official Development Assistance assessment (QuODA) by constructing four dimensions or pillars of aid quality built up from 30 separate indicators are done for the analysis.

Keywords: research gap; quality official assistance; QuODA; countries; report; edition; assessment; respcet; definitions; funders; agencies; donors; development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-11
Note: Institutional Papers
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownl ... &AId=3228&fref=repec

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:3228

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from eSocialSciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Padma Prakash ().