Affirmative Action: Diverging Perspectives

Prashant Negi

Working Papers from eSocialSciences

Abstract: The debate, on affirmative action seems to be focusing on the meaning and relevance of merit and efficiency. It is being conveniently forgotten that merit is a cognitive ability, the power to perceive and to grasp the social reality. Further, merit is being juxtaposed with an individual’s entitlements, which makes the concept doubly complex. The attributes of merit, as are being defined by the corporate sector, are based on the notions of heredity and ascription, rather than being socially constructed. The question of merit, therefore, demands a sustained and careful analysis and indeed needs to answer - how to detect merit?; how to define merit?; and how to ascertain and establish a proper sphere of influence for merit?

Keywords: affirmative action; caste; dalit; merit; scheduled castes; scheduled tribes; Sociology; Dalit Studies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-05
Note: Current Affairs
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownl ... s&AId=509&fref=repec

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:509

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from eSocialSciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Padma Prakash ().