Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared

Masahiko Aoki

Working Papers from eSocialSciences

Abstract: This essay provides a game-theoretic, endogenous view of institutions, and then applies the idea to identify the sources of institutional trajectories of economic development in China, Japan, and Korea. It stylizes the Malthusian-phase of East Asian economies as peasant-based economies in which small families allocated their working time between farming on small plots— leased or owned—and handcrafting for personal consumption and markets. It then compares institutional arrangements across these economies that sustained otherwise similar economies. It characterizes the varied nature of the political states of Qing China, Tokugawa Japan, and Yi Korea by focusing on the way in which agricultural taxes were enforced. It also identifies different patterns of social norms of trust that were institutional complements to, or substitutes for, political states. Finally, it traces the path-dependent transformations of these state-norm combinations along subsequent transitions to post-Malthusian phases of economic growth in the respective economies.

Keywords: Game- theoretic; Path- dependent; Economic Development; Consumption; Market; post-Malthusian; Political States; economic Growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-02
Note: Institutional Papers
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownl ... &AId=5258&fref=repec

Related works:
Chapter: Historical sources of institutional trajectories in economic development: China, Japan and Korea compared (2013)
Working Paper: Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared (2012)
Working Paper: Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared (2012)
Working Paper: Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:5258

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from eSocialSciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Padma Prakash ().