Regenerative Climate Economics: A Capital Architecture for the Age of Permanent Crisis

Roshan Ghadamian
Additional contact information
Roshan Ghadamian: Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture

IRSA Working Papers from Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture

Abstract: Climate adaptation fails repeatedly, and not for want of money. It fails because the capital systems used to finance it are misaligned with the physical and temporal dynamics of climate risk. Using Regenerative Cycle Architecture, this paper shows that adaptation is governed by a political fragility cycle: short electoral cycles override the long, recurring lifetimes of climate assets. Grants, debt, insurance and annual appropriations are single-cycle or liability-bearing instruments, and each is structurally incompatible with multi-cycle mission demand. The paper defines PSC-C, the political-fragility mode of Perennial Social Capital, and argues that its function is not financial but constitutional: it separates capital cycles from political cycles so that pumps, levees, coastal buffers, cooling centres, fire equipment and drought infrastructure are replaced predictably across government turnover. The formal content is a single constraint — the capital activation schedule is fixed ex ante and invariant to the political cycle — and shows that this is ghadamian2025rca's decoupling condition written on the schedule rather than the stock, which is the stronger statement and the one that rules out silent deferral. At national scale, PSC-C pools give local governments autonomous multi-decade capital cycles while preserving fiscal neutrality. For developing nations they replace disaster-driven borrowing with sovereign-safe cycle governance. Extended globally they yield a Global Regenerative Climate Fund: a federated, cycle-governed, zero-liability architecture supplying the institutional substrate that COP21 and the Green Climate Fund do not. The central claim is that climate adaptation does not require more capital; it requires capital that behaves differently. âš ï¸ Two qualifications are carried in the body rather than conceded at the end: what PSC-C preserves is governance continuity and not a regenerating principal (), and what it depoliticises is replenishment and not entry ().

Keywords: climate adaptation; capital governance; political fragility; PSC-C; capital constitution; deferred maintenance; adaptation finance; Global Regenerative Climate Fund (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E62 H54 H84 Q54 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5795662 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:evk:wpaper:climate

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IRSA Working Papers from Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Roshan Ghadamian ().