Valuing the Unlicensed Commons: A Methodology for Charitable Transfers of Non-Standard Knowledge Assets

Roshan Ghadamian
Additional contact information
Roshan Ghadamian: Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture

IRSA Working Papers from Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture

Abstract: Charitable transfer of intellectual property is a structurally underdeveloped mechanism in philanthropic finance, and part of the reason is methodological. Qualified-appraisal standards address conventional IP — patents with licensing histories, software with market comparables, trademarks with royalty streams — and give no systematic guidance for assets whose value lies in their cost of production, their option potential, or their social utility rather than in a commercial transaction history. The consequence is material. Pharmaceutical companies, research universities, technology firms, independent media organisations and government-adjacent research bodies hold knowledge assets of substantial appraised value that generate near-zero commercial return, carry ongoing maintenance cost, and are effectively inaccessible to the research commons. This paper calls them stranded knowledge assets: private value declining, potential social value significant or growing. It proposes four valuation methods — Cost-to-Recreate, Comparable Licensing Value, Option Value and Social Value Discount — applies them across five asset classes, and closes with three recommendations to revenue authorities that require no legislative change. 🔴 And it takes seriously that a valuation framework for assets with no market price is a deduction-inflation instrument unless it is built not to be. names the abuse vector for each method and the safeguard against it, against the precedent of conservation-easement syndication — which drew targeted legislation, enhanced examination and court penalties. That section is the paper's real contribution and in the source it is a subsection.

Keywords: stranded knowledge assets; charitable IP transfer; qualified appraisal; cost-to-recreate; option value; social value discount; knowledge commons; deduction abuse (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D64 H25 K34 L31 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6565358 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:evk:wpaper:vuc

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IRSA Working Papers from Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Roshan Ghadamian ().