Strategic Ambiguity and Decision-making: An Experimental Study
Dudley Cooke and
Sara le Roux ()
Additional contact information
Dudley Cooke: Department of Economics, University of Exeter
No 1605, Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics
We conducted a set of experiments to compare the effect of ambiguity in single person decisions and games. Our results suggest that ambiguity has a bigger impact in games than in ball and urn problems. We ?nd that ambiguity has the opposite effect in games of strategic substitutes and complements. This con?rms a theoretical prediction made by Eichberger and Kelsey (2002). The experiments also test whether subjects' ?perception of ambiguity differs when faced by a local opponent as opposed to a foreign one. Our results show that there is little evidence of more in?uence of ambiguity on behaviour when faced by foreign subjects.
Keywords: Ambiguity; Choquet expected utility; strategic complements; strategic substitutes; Ellsberg urn. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 D03 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp, nep-gth, nep-hpe and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Strategic ambiguity and decision-making: an experimental study (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:exe:wpaper:1605
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jingnan (Cecilia) Chen ().