Criminalising Non-Fatal Strangulation in the United Kingdom: Comparative Legal Analysis and Early Evidence on Intimate Partner Homicides
Lisa Cherkassky,
Alaiba Faheem,
Sonia Oreffice and
Climent Quintana-Domeque
Additional contact information
Lisa Cherkassky: Law School, University of Exeter
Alaiba Faheem: Department of Economics, University of Exeter
Sonia Oreffice: Department of Economics, University of Exeter
Climent Quintana-Domeque: Department of Economics, University of Exeter
No 2604, Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics
Abstract:
This article examines how non-fatal strangulation and suffocation (NFS) conduct is criminalised across UK jurisdictions and whether the introduction of a standalone NFS offence in England and Wales is associated with changes in intimate partner homicide (IPH). Its principal contribution is comparative and legal: it shows how England and Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland differ in defining, charging, and proving NFS-type conduct. The analysis argues that standalone offences give NFS specific visibility as a high-risk form of coercive violence, reduce reliance on visible injury, and create clearer evidential, charging, and recording pathways. By contrast, Scotland’s reliance on general assault, attempted murder, sexual offences where relevant, and course-of-behaviour domestic abuse legislation offers serious legal responses but less offence-specific labelling of NFS as a distinct risk marker. Exploratory difference-in-differences analysis suggests declines in female-victim IPH counts in England and Wales, but causal inference is limited by pre-trends, rare-event volatility, and short follow-up.
Keywords: non-fatal strangulation; intimate partner violence; intimate partner homicide; domestic abuse law; offence design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I18 J12 J16 K14 K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-05-05, Revised 2026-06-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://exetereconomics.github.io/RePEc/dpapers/DP2604.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:exe:wpaper:2604
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sebastian Kripfganz ().