Which alternative to choose: does the excess sensitivity hypothesis or a time varying term premium explain the failure of the rational expectations hypothesis of the term structure?

Elias Tzavalis

Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics

Abstract: Contrary to the predictions of the rational expectations hypothesis of the term structure, empirical evidence suggest that the term spread between long and short rates fails to forecast future long term rates although its forecasts of future short term rates are in the correct direction. This paper examinines which of two popular alternative hypotheses - the excess sensitivity of the long term rate to the contemporaneous short term rate and the rational expectations hypothesis allowing for a time varying term premium - can explain the failure of the pure version of the expectations theory. Using US data at the short and long end of the term structure, the results clearly reject the excess sensitivity hypothesis, and suggest that the anomalies of the term spread can be attributed to the different way that the term premium affect each of the term spread models. It is found that the term premium influencing the term spread model forecasting future long rates is much more volatile than the term premium of the term spread model forecasting future short term rates. In order to remove the term premium biases from the slope of the term spread a simple model of the term premium is employed.

Keywords: Term structure; rational expectations, vector autoregression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C23 C52 E43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:exe:wpaper:9711

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sebastian Kripfganz ().