EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Distortion effects of Export quota policy: an analysis ofThe China - Raw materials dispute

Christophe Charlier () and Sarah Guillou ()

No 2013-07, Documents de Travail de l'OFCE from Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE)

Abstract: The China-Raw materials dispute recently arbitrated by the WTO opposed China as defendant to the US and the EU as claimants, on the somewhat unusual issue of export restrictions. For the claimants, Chinese export restrictions on various raw materials of which the country is a major producer create shortages in foreign markets. This scarcity does not prevail in the Chinese market and the price in the foreign markets increases, providing a cost advantage to the Chinese industries using these raw materials.China defends export limitations using Article XX of the GATT 1994 on possible exceptions to the prohibition of quantitative restrictions to conserve natural resources. This paper offers a theoretical analysis of the dispute with the help of a model of a monopoly extracting a non-renewable resource and selling it on both the domestic and foreign markets using Fischer and Laxminarayan (2004)'s framework. The theoretical results focus on the effects of imposing an export quota on quantities, prices and efficacy, and are used to comment on the claims of the parties and on the findings of the Panel and Appellate Body. Given the crucial importance of demand elasticities in this theoretical understanding of the conflict the empirical part of the paper provides estimates of import demand elasticity of the claimants as well as of China for each product concerned in the case, defined at the HS6 level. The empirical results show that among the products concerned in the dispute, two groups can be differentiated depending on China's export position. When China is a major or first exporter, there is no evident sign of the distortionary effect of an export quota. When China is a weak exporter, but a strong producer and consumer, there is evidence coherent with the model according to which China is imposing a quota export restriction that is inefficient. Key Words:Export restrictions, WTO, exhaustible natural resources, price discrimina- tion,Article XX of the GATT 1994.

JEL-codes: F13 F18 F51 K33 Q37 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/pdf/dtravail/WP2013-07.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Distortion effects of export quota policy: an analysis of the China-Raw Materials dispute (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Distortion Effects of Export Quota Policy: an Analysis of the China - Raw Materials Dispute (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Distortion Effects of Export Quota Policy: an Analysis of the China - Raw Materials Dispute (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Distortion Effects of Export Quota Policy: An Analysis of the China - Raw Materials Dispute (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Distortion effects of export quota policy: an analysis of the China-Raw Materials dispute (2014)
Working Paper: Distortion Effects of Export Quota Policy: An Analysis of the China - Raw Materials Dispute (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fce:doctra:1307

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Documents de Travail de l'OFCE from Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesco Saraceno ().

 
Page updated 2020-08-08
Handle: RePEc:fce:doctra:1307