The (lack of) impact of impact: Why impact evaluations seldom lead to evidence-based policymaking

Jean-Louis Arcand

No P73, Working Papers from FERDI

Abstract: A recurring puzzle to many academics and some policymakers is why impact evaluations, which have become something of a cottage industry in the development field, have so little impact on actual policymaking. In this paper, I study the impact of impact evaluations. I show, in a simple Bayesian framework embedded within a standard contest success function-based model of competition amongst anti-evaluation policymakers, Bayesian policymakers, and frequentist evaluators, that the likelihood of a program being cancelled is a decreasing function both of the impact estimated by the evaluation and of the prior on whose basis the program was approved to begin with. Moreover, the probability of cancellation is a decreasing function of the effectiveness of the influence exerted by frequentist evaluators.

JEL-codes: C11 C21 C72 D04 D72 O12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ferdi.fr/sites/www.ferdi.fr/files/publi ... P73_JLArcand_web.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The (Lack of) Impact of Impact: Why Impact Evaluations Seldom Lead to Evidence-based Policymaking (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fdi:wpaper:467

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from FERDI Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vincent Mazenod ().