Using Neurological Evidence to Differentiate between Informational and Social Herding among Strategic Mortgage Defaulters

Michael Seiler () and Eric Walden

Artefactual Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website

Abstract: Great debate is being waged between whether strategic mortgage defaulters follow a herd for social reasons or mimic others' behavior for informational gain. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the latest neurological technology allowing for observation of brain activity during strategic mortgage default decision-making, we find that when defaulters learn of peer default behavior, they acknowledge the social component of the decision, but feel freer to make their own decisions. Alternatively, when observing the behavior of a maven (real estate expert), borrowers still consider the social aspect of the decision (although to a lesser extent), but ultimately follow the maven who presumably possesses a greater information set. Alarmingly, borrowers only significantly follow the herd when mavens advocate strategic default, not when they recommend against it.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00633.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Using Neurological Evidence to Differentiate between Informational and Social Herding among Strategic Mortgage Defaulters (2016)
Journal Article: Using Neurological Evidence to Differentiate between Informational and Social Herding among Strategic Mortgage Defaulters (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:artefa:00633

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Artefactual Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta ().