The GMO Dispute before the WTO: Legal Implications for the Trade and Environment Debate
Francesco Sindico
Additional contact information
Francesco Sindico: Universitat Jaume I
No 2005.11, Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
Abstract:
USA, Canada and Argentina have challenged before the World Trade Organisation the European Communities’ (EC) denial of Genetically Modified (GM) product imports, which took place from 1998 to 2004 . Against this background, the goal of this paper is twofold. Firstly, we will determine which WTO provisions would have been violated by the EC. Secondly, we will highlight the dispute’s most important legal issues in order to see to what extent the dispute might influence the ongoing trade and environment debate. The paper concludes that the role of the precautionary principle in the application of the EC legislation is one of the dispute’s main issues. Furthermore, the Panel findings on the legal nature of the precautionary principle, and on its relevance for the interpretation of WTO provisions, will finally determine the influence of the GMO dispute on the trade and environment debate.
Keywords: GMO; WTO; Trade; Environment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F10 Q00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-env and nep-reg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://feem-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/w ... oads/NDL2005-011.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fem:femwpa:2005.11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alberto Prina Cerai ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).