“Google it!”Forecasting the US Unemployment Rate with a Google Job Search index
Francesco D’Amuri and
Juri Marcucci
Additional contact information
Francesco D’Amuri: Economic Research Department
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Francesco D'Amuri
No 2010.31, Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
Abstract:
We suggest the use of an Internet job-search indicator (the Google Index, GI) as the best leading indicator to predict the US unemployment rate. We perform a deep out-of-sample forecasting comparison analyzing many models that adopt both our preferred leading indicator (GI), the more standard initial claims or combinations of both. We find that models augmented with the GI outperform the traditional ones in predicting the monthly unemployment rate, even in most state-level forecasts and in comparison with the Survey of Professional Forecasters.
Keywords: Google Econometrics; Forecast Comparison; Keyword search; US Unemployment; Time Series Models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C53 E27 E37 J60 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-for and nep-lab
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)
Downloads: (external link)
https://feem-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/w ... oads/NDL2010-031.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: ‘Google it!’ Forecasting the US unemployment rate with a Google job search index (2009) 
Working Paper: "Google it!" Forecasting the US unemployment rate with a Google job search index (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fem:femwpa:2010.31
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alberto Prina Cerai ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).