Minimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum game

Julio Rotemberg

No 06-12, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Abstract: I suppose that people react with anger when others show themselves not to be minimally altruistic. With heterogeneous agents, this can account for the experimental results of ultimatum and dictator games. Moreover, it can account for the surprisingly large fraction of individuals who offer an even split, with parameter values that are more plausible than those required to explain outcomes in these experiments with the models of Levine (1998), Fehr and Schmidt (1999), Dickinson (2000), and Bolton and Ockenfels (2000).

Keywords: Game theory; Altruism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/wp/wp2006/wp0612.htm (text/html)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/wp/wp2006/wp0612.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Minimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum game (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedbwp:06-12

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Spozio ().