Estimating dynamic rational expectations models when the trend specification is uncertain
Timothy Cogley ()
No 96-01, Working Papers in Applied Economic Theory from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Abstract:
This paper explores various strategies for estimating rational expectations models when the trend specification is uncertain. One approach modified the likelihood function in order to reduce the influence of low-frequency dynamics. Hansen and Sargent (1993) conjectured that this would have little cost in correctly specified models and would improve estimated in mis-specified models. This paper confirms the first part of their conjecture but not the second. Contrary to intuition, the effects of trend-specification errors are spread across the entire frequency domain and are not confined to low-frequencies. Hence, deleting low-frequency dynamics does not remove the specification error. Another approach seeks a representation of the approximating model that does not condition on a specification of the trend, and it estimated parameters by GMM. This approach compares favorably with MLS when the trend is correctly specified and is superior when the trend is mis-specified.
Keywords: Rational expectations (Economic theory); Econometric models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-ets
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/7038/item/639054 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedfap:96-01
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers in Applied Economic Theory from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Research Library ().