Nexus, throwbacks, and the weighting game

Kelly Edmiston ()

No 2005-02, Community Affairs Research Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Abstract: This paper modifies a model proposed by Anand and Sansing (2000) to explain why states have chosen different formulas for corporate income apportionment. I demonstrate that nexus assumptions and allocation rules can have significant effects on the outcomes of the model, and are important considerations in analyzing the impetus for and effects of apportionment competition.

Keywords: Corporations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/cap/Edmiston_WP_NexusThrowbacks05.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/cap/Edmiston_WP_NexusThrowbacks05.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/cap/Edmiston_WP_NexusThrowbacks05.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedkcw:2005-02

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Community Affairs Research Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Zach Kastens ().