On the denomination of government debt: a critique of the portfolio balance approach

David Backus and Patrick Kehoe

No 116, Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Abstract: We show that some classes of sterilized interventions have no effect on equilibrium prices and quantities. The proof does not require complete markets, Ricardian equivalence, monetary neutrality, or the law of one price. Moreover, regressions of exchange rates or interest differentials on variables measuring debt?s currency composition contain no information about the effectiveness of such interventions. Other interventions require changes in monetary and fiscal policy; their effects depend, generally, on the influence of these changes on the economy and not on the intervention alone. In short, sterilized intervention is not, as the portfolio balance approach indicates, an extra policy instrument.

Keywords: Foreign exchange - Law and legislation; Debts, External (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1988
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://minneapolisfed.org/research/common/pub_detail.cfm?pb_autonum_id=397 (application/pdf)
http://minneapolisfed.org/research/sr/sr116.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: On the denomination of government debt: A critique of the portfolio balance approach (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmsr:116

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kate Hansel ().