Rent-seeking and innovation

Michele Boldrin and David Levine

No 347, Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Abstract: Innovations and their adoption are the keys to growth and development. Innovations are less socially useful, but more profitable for the innovator, when they are adopted slowly and the innovator remains a monopolist. For this reason, rent-seeking, both public and private, plays an important role in determining the social usefulness of innovations. This paper examines the political economy of intellectual property, analyzing the trade-off between private and public rent-seeking. While it is true in principle that public rent-seeking may be a substitute for private rent-seeking, it is not true that this results always either in less private rent-seeking or in a welfare improvement. When the public sector itself is selfish and behaves rationally, we may experience the worst of public and private rent-seeking together.

Keywords: technological innovations; Rent (Economic theory); Intellectual property (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/sr/sr347.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Rent-seeking and innovation (2004)
Working Paper: Rent Seeking and Innovation (2003)
Working Paper: Rent Seeking and Innovation (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmsr:347

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kate Hansel (kate.s.hansel@mpls.frb.org).