Gambling for redemption and self-fulfilling debt crises
Juan Carlos Conesa () and
Timothy Kehoe ()
No 465, Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
We develop a model for analyzing the sovereign debt crises of 2010–2012 in the Eurozone. The government sets its expenditure-debt policy optimally. The need to sell large quantities of bonds every period leaves the government vulnerable to self-fulfilling crises in which investors, anticipating a crisis, are unwilling to buy the bonds, thereby provoking the crisis. In this situation, the optimal policy of the government is to reduce its debt to a level where crises are not possible. If, however, the economy is in a recession where there is a positive probability of recovery in fiscal revenues, the government may optimally choose to “gamble for redemption,” running deficits and increasing its debt, thereby increasing its vulnerability to crises.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Gambling for redemption and self-fulfilling debt crises (2017)
Working Paper: Gambling for Redemption and Self-Fulfilling Debt Crises (2015)
Working Paper: Gambling for Redemption and Self-Fulfilling Debt Crises (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmsr:465
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jannelle Ruswick ().