Optimal Capital Taxation Revisited
Varadarajan Chari (),
Juan Pablo Nicolini () and
Pedro Teles ()
No 571, Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
We revisit the question of how capital should be taxed. We allow for a rich set of tax instruments that consists of taxes widely used in practice, including consumption, dividend, capital, and labor income taxes. We restrict policies to respect promises that the government has made in the previous period regarding the current value of wealth. We show that capital should not be taxed if households have preferences that are standard in the macroeconomics literature. We show that Ramsey outcomes that must respect such promises are time consistent. We show that the presumption in the literature that capital should be taxed for some length of time arises because the tax system is restricted.
Keywords: Time consistency; Production efficiency; Capital income tax (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E60 E61 E62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-dge, nep-mac and nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/sr/sr571.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Optimal Capital Taxation Revisited (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmsr:571
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jannelle Ruswick ().