New Keynesian models: not yet useful for policy analysis

Varadarajan Chari, Patrick Kehoe and Ellen McGrattan

No 664, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Abstract: In the 1970s macroeconomists often disagreed bitterly. Macroeconomists have now largely converged on method, model design, and macroeconomic policy advice. The disagreements that remain all stem from the practical implementation of the methodology. Some macroeconomists think that New Keynesian models are on the verge of being useful for quarter-to-quarter quantitative policy advice. We do not. We argue that the shocks in these models are dubiously structural and show that many of the features of the model as well as the implications due to these features are inconsistent with microeconomic evidence. These arguments lead us to conclude that New Keynesian models are not yet useful for policy analysis.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/pub_display.cfm?id=3610 (application/pdf)
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/WP/WP664.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: New Keynesian Models: Not Yet Useful for Policy Analysis (2009)
Working Paper: New Keynesian models: not yet useful for policy analysis (2008)
Working Paper: New Keynesian Models: Not Yet Useful for Policy Analysis (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmwp:664

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kate Hansel ().