Are BHC and Federal Reserve Stress Test Results Converging? What Do We Learn from 2015?
Anna Kovner and
No 20150406, Liberty Street Economics from Federal Reserve Bank of New York
In March, the Federal Reserve and thirty-one large U.S. bank holding companies (BHCs) announced results of the latest Dodd-Frank Act-mandated stress tests. Some commentators have argued that BHCs, in designing their stress test models, have strong incentives to mimic the Fed’s stress test results, since the Fed’s results are an integral part of the Federal Reserve’s supervisory assessment of capital adequacy for these firms. In this post, we look at the 2015 stress test projections by the eighteen largest U.S. BHCs and by the Fed and compare them to similar numbers from 2013 and 2014. As stress testing becomes more established, do we see evidence that the BHCs are mimicking the Fed?
Keywords: banks; stress testing; Dodd-Frank Act stress test (DFAST); bank holding companies (BHCs) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2015 ... learn-from-2015.html Full text (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fednls:87021
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Liberty Street Economics from Federal Reserve Bank of New York Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().