The production impact of "cash-for-clunkers": implications for stabilization policy
Adam Copeland () and
James Kahn ()
No 503, Staff Reports from Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Stabilization policies frequently aim to boost spending as a means to increase GDP. Spending does not necessarily translate into production, however, especially when inventories are involved. We look at the ?cash-for-clunkers? program that helped finance the purchase of nearly 700,000 vehicles in 2009. An analysis of auto sales and production movements reveals that the program did prompt a large spike in sales. But the program had only a modest and fleeting impact on production, as inventories buffered the movements in sales. These findings suggest caution in judging the efficacy of such policies by their impact on spending alone.
Keywords: cash-for-clunkers; automobiles; stimulus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E23 E65 L62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene
Note: For a published version of this report, see Adam Copeland and James Kahn, "The Production Impact of "Cash-for-Clunkers": Implications for Stabilization Policy," Economic Inquiry 51, no. 1 (January 2013): 288-303.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: THE PRODUCTION IMPACT OF “CASH-FOR-CLUNKERS”: IMPLICATIONS FOR STABILIZATION POLICY (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fednsr:503
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Staff Reports from Federal Reserve Bank of New York Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().