Optimal taxation in life-cycle economies
Andres Erosa () and
Martin Gervais ()
No 00-02, Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
We use a very standard life-cycle growth model, in which individuals have a labor-leisure choice in each period of their lives, to prove that an optimizing government will almost always find it optimal to tax or subsidize interest income. The intuition for our result is straightforward. In a life-cycle model the individual?s optimal consumption-work plan is almost never constant and an optimizing government almost always taxes consumption goods and labor earnings at different rates over an individual?s lifetime. One way to achieve this goal is to use capital and labor income taxes that vary with age. If tax rates cannot be conditioned on age, a non-zero tax on capital income is also optimal, as it can (imperfectly) mimic age-conditioned consumption and labor income tax rates.
Keywords: Taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/w ... /2000/pdf/wp00-2.pdf (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Optimal Taxation in Life-Cycle Economies (2002)
Working Paper: Optimal Taxation in Life-Cycle Economies (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedrwp:00-02
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().