The macroeconomics of U.S. consumer bankruptcy choice: chapter 7 or chapter 13?
Wenli Li () and
Pierre Daniel Sarte ()
No 02-01, Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Because of the recent surge in U.S. personal defaults, Congress is currently debating bankruptcy reform legislation requiring a means test for Chapter 7 filers. This paper explores the effects of such a reform in a model where, in contrast to previous work, bankruptcy options and production are explicitly taken into account. Our findings indicate that means testing would not improve upon current bankruptcy provisions and, at best, leaves aggregate filings, output, and welfare unchanged. Put simply,given already existing provisions, the introduction of an efficient means test would not bind. However, we do find that a tightening of existing bankruptcy laws, in the form of lower Chapter 7 asset exemptions, can be welfare improving. Contrary to previous studies, the analysis also suggests that eliminating bankruptcy entirely would cause significant declines in both output and welfare.
Keywords: Bankruptcy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/w ... /2002/pdf/wp02-1.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: The macroeconomics of U.S. consumer bankruptcy choice: Chapter 7 or Chapter 13? (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedrwp:02-01
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().