Economics at your fingertips  

Who Values Access to College?

Urvi Neelakantan, Felicia Ionescu, Ivan Vidangos and Kartik Athreya ()

No 19-5, Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Abstract: At first glance, college appears to be of great value to most, given its mean returns and sharply subsidized tuition. An empirically-disciplined human capital model that allows for variation in college readiness suggests otherwise: Nearly half of high school completers place zero value on access to college. This renders blanket subsidies potentially inefficient. As proof of principle, we show that redirecting subsidies away from those who would nonetheless enroll--towards a stock index retirement fund for those who do not even when college is subsidized--increases ex-ante welfare by 1 percent of mean consumption, while preserving enrollment and budget neutrality.

Keywords: Human Capital; Financial Investment; Higher Education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 I24 E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2019-02-20, Revised 2019-02-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fle
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) ... ers/2019/wp19-05.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Who Values Access to College? (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christian Pascasio ().

Page updated 2020-01-25
Handle: RePEc:fip:fedrwp:19-05