The effect of risk preferences on the valuation and incentives of compensation contracts
Pierre Chaigneau ()
FMG Discussion Papers from Financial Markets Group
We use a comparative approach to study the incentives provided by di erent types of compensation contracts, and their valuation by risk averse managers, in a fairly general setting. We show that concave contracts tend to provide more incentives to risk averse managers, while convex contracts tend to be more valued by prudent managers. Thus, prudence can contribute to explain the prevalence of stock-options in executive compen- sation. We also present a condition on the utility function which enables to compare the structure of optimal contracts associated with di erent risk preferences.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-hrm, nep-mic and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fmg:fmgdps:dp697
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in FMG Discussion Papers from Financial Markets Group
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The FMG Administration ().