 How did wars dampen trade in the MENA region?Fida Karam and Chahir Zaki No 17, AGRODEP working papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Abstract: This paper investigates the effects of war on trade in the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA), an area at considerable risk for conflicts. Using an augmented gravity model, we introduce a war variable and distinguish between different types of conflicts. We run a battery of sensitivity analysis tests to control for the endogeneity problem that may arise in our estimation. The results show that, in general, wars have a significantly negative impact on trade (exports and imports); civil conflicts in particular hinder exports, imports, and overall trade significantly. The disaggregated version of the gravity model shows that non-state conflicts have a detrimental effect on bilateral trade flows in manufacturing; however, none of the conflicts modeled affect trade in services. Finally, the outcome of the gravity model for manufacturing has been used to compute ad-valorem equivalents (AVEs) of wars at the country level. We found that, on average, a conflict is equivalent to a tariff of 5 percent of the value of trade. More heterogeneity is observed at the sectoral level, where AVEs range from 4 to 65 percent. Keywords: models; trade; armed conflicts; Northern Africa; Middle East; Western Asia (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:agrowp:17 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in AGRODEP working papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.