The political economy of reforming agricultural support policies
Will Martin () and
No 2163, IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Agricultural support policies cost more than US$800 billion per year in transfers to the farm sector worldwide. Support policies based on subsidies and trade barriers are highly distortive to markets and are also regressive as most support is provided to larger farmers. On balance, the incentives this support creates appear to increase greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. In addition, some subsidies undermine the production of more nutrient-dense commodities that are otherwise critical for the improvement of dietary outcomes. This paper first highlights that better outcomes could be achieved if even a small portion of agricultural subsidies were repurposed into investments in research and development (R&D) dedicated to productivity-enhancing and emission-reducing technologies. This would create multiple wins â€” mitigating global climate change, reducing poverty, increasing food security, and improving nutrition. Nonetheless, the political economy challenges to doing so are sizeable. Because current support policies are often politically popular and serve well-organized interests, reform is difficult without committed political leadership and multilateral collaboration. Using several case studies of both successful and failed changes of agricultural support policies in China, India, and the EU and the United States, we highlight lessons learned about the political economy constraints on and possibilities for reform.
Keywords: CHINA; EAST ASIA; ASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA; EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES; UNITED STATES; USA; NORTH AMERICA; AMERICAS; agriculture; agricultural policies; climate change; commodities; farmers; food security; greenhouse gas emissions; markets; market disruptions; nutrition; political systems; subsidies; trade barriers; economic reform; emission-reducing technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-env and nep-pol
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2163
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().