Conceptual framework on price volatility and its impact on food and nutrition security in the short term
Pierre Boulanger and
Maximo Torero ()
FOODSECURE Working papers from LEI Wageningen UR
This paper establishes a conceptual framework that links short-term price changes with food and nutrition security. We first provide an overview on the causes of commodity price volatility and approaches to measure volatility. Next, different concepts to measure food security impacts are elaborated and discussed. In contrast to consumption, utility or perception based indicators, anthropometric indicators provide the most direct measure of nutritional impacts. An extensive literature review emphasizes that anthropometric indicators can respond significantly within few months to shocks like droughts, seasonality or economic crises. As there is few research on the impact of price shocks to nutritional status, the developed conceptual framework elaborates different channels how price changes and price risks affect households and food security. The paper concludes with implications for further research to analyze the impact of price volatility on food security empirically.
JEL-codes: C6 Q11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www3.lei.wur.nl/FoodSecurePublications/15_K ... iceVolatilityFNS.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fsc:fspubl:15
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in FOODSECURE Working papers from LEI Wageningen UR Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Barbara van der Hout (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .