Evaluating Social Policy by Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods

Espen Bratberg (), Astrid Grasdal and Alf Risa ()

Norway; Department of Economics, University of Bergen from Department of Economics, University of Bergen

Abstract: Establishing causal relationships in social policy evaluation is important, but difficult due to sample selection. To evaluate the performance of estimators designed to handle sample selection bias we analyse data from a Norwegian rehabilitation project with a randomised experimental design. The data permit us to compare the performance of different nonexperimental estimators with the experimental results. In our case study we find that nonexperimental evaluation based on sample selection estimators with selection terms which fails to meet conventional levels of statistical significance is highly unreliable. The difference in difference estimator and stratification on propensity scores perform better in our context.

Keywords: STATISTICS; SOCIAL POLICY; EXPERIMENTS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C44 C82 H30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Evaluating Social Policy by Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:bereco:1700

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Norway; Department of Economics, University of Bergen from Department of Economics, University of Bergen Department of Economics, University of Bergen Fosswinckels Gate 6. N-5007 Bergen, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().