PROTECTIONIST THREATS AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
Bruce Blonigen and
Robert Feenstra ()
Department of Economics from California Davis - Department of Economics
The recent literature on quid pro quo foreign direct investment (FDI) suggests that FDI may be induced by the threat of protection, and further, that FDI may be used as an instrument to defuse a protectionist threat. This paper uses a panel data set of 4-digit SIC level observations of Japanese manufacturing FDI into the United States in the 1980s to explore these hypotheses empirically. We find strong statistical support for the hypothesis that higher threats of protection lead to greater FDI flows, and post-regression simulations find that a rise in the expected probability of protection from five to ten percent means over a 30 percent rise in next-period FDI flows for an average industry. In addition, there is evidence that non-acquisition FDI by the Japanese had success in defusing the threat of an escape clause investigation in future periods.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
Working Paper: Protectionist Threats and Foreign Direct Investment (2003)
Chapter: Protectionist Threats and Foreign Direct Investment (1997)
Working Paper: Protectionist Threats and Foreign Direct Investment (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:caldec:96-01
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Department of Economics from California Davis - Department of Economics University of California Davis - Department of Economics. One Shields Ave., California 95616-8578. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().