Is It Welfare Improving to Insulate Monetary Policy from the Political Arena?

Juan Carlos Berganza ()

Working Papers from Centro de Estudios Monetarios Y Financieros-

Abstract: This paper presents a two-party model in which partisan and opportunistic politicians have two options: (i) to reach an agreement with respect to the central banker before elections are held, which leads to elections becoming a toss up, or (ii) to let the citizens vote for their proposed central bankers, which endogenizes the probabilities of being elected. Parties want to appoint their ideal central bankers (partisan), they care about winning the elections (opportunistic), and they are risk-averse about the electoral results. The paper shows that, under some circunstances, both parties may be interested in leaving the appointment of the central banker out of the electoral contest.

Keywords: CENTRAL BANKS; PUBLIC POLICY; MONETARY POLICY; GAME THEORY (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D72 D78 E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:cemfdt:9902

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Centro de Estudios Monetarios Y Financieros- Centro de Estudios Monetarios Y Financieros. Casado del Alisal, 5-28014 Madrid, Spain.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().