Were Trade and Factor Mobility Substitutes in History?

William Collins, Kevin O'Rourke and Jeffrey Williamson ()

Working Papers from College Dublin, Department of Political Economy-

Abstract: Trade theorists have come to understand that their theory is ambiguous on the question : Are trade and factor flows substitutes? This paper uses history to fill the gap.

Keywords: INTERNATIONAL; TRADE (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F1 F2 N7 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Were Trade and Factor Mobility Substitutes in History? (1997)
Working Paper: Were Trade and Factor Mobility Substitutes in History? (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:dublec:97/15

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from College Dublin, Department of Political Economy- Ireland; University College Dublin, Department of Political Economy, Centre for Economic Research, Belfield, Dublin 4. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().