Social Optimal Licensing of Innovations
Working Papers from Michigan State - Econometrics and Economic Theory
A profit-maximizing monopolist licenses a cost-reducing innovation to downstream firms that compete strategically. Katz and Shapiro (1986) find the seemingly obvious result that "the [monopolist's] incentive to disseminate the innovation typically are too low." Instead, the author finds that the incentives are typically too high. Only if the lab is owned by more than half of the firms and does not disseminate the innovation to all member, would the incentives always be too low. Social incentives can be less than the private incentives for even one license. These changes come from relaxing previous authors' assumption that it is cost-less to install the innovation.
Keywords: OPTIMUM CHOICE; INNOVATIONS; LICENCES (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O31 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:mistet:9803
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Michigan State - Econometrics and Economic Theory MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, EAST LANSING MICHIGAN 48824 U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().