The Indexing Impasse: Is "the Intersection Approach" a Solution?

B.C. Brun and Bertil Tungodden

Working Papers from Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration-

Abstract: Rawls (1971,1993) suggests that interpersonal comparisons of well-being should be based on a primary goods index, but it is well-known that in general this approach is not compatible with the Pareto principle. This is the indexing impasse. Sen (1985,1991) argues that this is partly due to the fact that the approach does not take note of the citizen's orderings of these bundles of valuable objects. He suggests an +intersection approach ; , which is an incomplete approach to interpersonal comparisons based on judgements that are shared implications of the relevant set of weighting schemes. In this paper, we show that +the intersection approach; does not provide any solution to the indexing impasse. Unless the individuals have identical preferences, +the intersection approach; is incompatible with the Pareto principle.

Keywords: SOCIAL; WELFARE (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 14 pages
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:norgee:24/98

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration- NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HELLEVEIEN 30, 5035 BERGEN SANDVIKEN NORWAY.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().