Measuring Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Jeffrey Kling and
Working Papers from Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs
This paper evaluated the impact of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on inter-jusge sentencing disparity, which is defined as the differences in average nominal prison sentence lengths for comparable caseloads assigned to different judges. This disparity is measured as the dispersion disparity os a random effect in a zero-inlfatednegative binomial model.
Keywords: ECONOMIC MODELS; LAW; JUDGES (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K4 C5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 60 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Measuring Interjedge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:priwpu:207
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, PRINCETON NEW- JERSEY 08542 U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().