What Motives Should Guide Referees? On the Design of Mechanisms to Elict Options

Jacob Glazer () and A. Rubinstein
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Alexander Yakovlevich Rubinstein and Ariel Rubinstein ()

Working Papers from Tel Aviv - the Sackler Institute of Economic Studies

Abstract: The fate of a paper has to be determined. It can be either accepted or rejected. Each member from among group of referees has an opinion regarding the acceptability of the paper. The desirable outcome, is the view held by the majority of referees . Howver, any referee, if asked to make a recommendation, may not provide a sincere one. This paper is concerned with the design of mechanisms for decision making based on elicited opinions.

Keywords: DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D80 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:teavsa:3-96

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Tel Aviv - the Sackler Institute of Economic Studies Tel-Aviv University, The Sackler Institute of Economic Studies, Ramat Aviv 69 978 Tel-Aviv, Israel. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().