The Hausman-MaCurdy Controversy - Why Do Results Differ Between Studies?

M. Eklof and H. Sacklen

Working Papers from Uppsala - Working Paper Series

Abstract: The two perhaps most influencial empirical labor supply studies carried out in the US in recent years, Hausman (1981) and MaCurdy, Green & Paarsch (1990), report sharply contradicting labor supply estimates.In this paper we seek to uncover the driving forces behind the seemingly irreconcilable results. Our findings suggest that differences with respect to the estimated income and wage effects can be attributed to the use of differing nonlabor income and wage measures.

Keywords: LABOUR SUPPLY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 42 pages
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:uppaal:1997-30

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Uppsala - Working Paper Series UPPSALA UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, S-751 20 UPPSALA SWEDEN.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().