MODERN ROBBERS: SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS AND BRAKING THE ECONOMIC GROWTH
Konstanin Yanovsky,
Dmitry Cherney and
Artem Shadrin
Additional contact information
Konstanin Yanovsky: Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy
Dmitry Cherney: RANEPA
Artem Shadrin: RF Ministry Economic Development
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Konstantin Moshe Yanovskiy
Published Papers from Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy
Abstract:
Small well-motivated groups, including state officials, public and community activists, politicians etc proved their capacity to impose burden on economy. The power to do so in modern Market Democracies could be reached without “unsheathing the sword”. Old fashioned redistribution experts - roving bandits are crowded out by modern ones. The most common way is to use the whole of the state apparatus as a “sword,” and to resort for cover to care for the needy and protection of the vulnerable, the ill-informed, the weak, the sick, or the “unwise” economic agents from all kinds of possible dangers. The longer list of the categories of persons in need of protection because of their “weakness,” "underprivileged statute in the past" etc, the easier it becomes to justify regulatory interference, the growth of the state apparatus, the increase in state insurance programming, and other budgetary expenses. Classical liberal epoch's legislator presumed the economic agent is reasonable, rational and responsible. This assumption had been gradually substituting for the last century, by the implicit assumption of citizen's' limited capacity. The mechanism of the impact upon economic growth achieved by means of special interests groups’ expansion has been described by M. Olson. “Protection” takes place by means of market entry barriers placed in the way of agents or by means of various controls and regulations. One who imposes heavy Regulatory burden in the emerging markets, in transitional economies with weak property protection makes running fair business almost unaffordable.
Keywords: special interest groups; personal capacity assumptions; excessive regulation; regulations' reproduction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D73 K20 N14 O43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 51 pages
Date: 2013, Revised 2013
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.iep.ru/files/RePEc/gai/ppaper/141Yanovsky.pdf Revised version, 2013 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gai:ppaper:141
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Published Papers from Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aleksei Astakhov ().