Regional variation of innovation activity in Poland. The positive role of location in metropolitan areas affirmed
Tomasz Tomasz Brodzicki () and
Anna Golejewska ()
Additional contact information
Tomasz Tomasz Brodzicki: Faculty of Economics, University of Gdansk; Institute for Development
Anna Golejewska: Faculty of Economics, University of Gdansk
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Tomasz Brodzicki ()
No 1701, Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division from The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division
Poland’s innovation performance is unsatisfactory. In the context of the required shift of the present mostly-extensive growth paradigm to more knowledge and innovation-intensive one has to take into account the regional variation in innovative and economic activity in this middle-sized open economy in order to fine-tune its regional development and innovation policies. Using the firm-level data for manufacturing sector aggregated to NUTS3 regions as well as firm-level data from a unique qualitative survey carried out by the Institute for Development we try to identify the determinants of variation in innovative activity of firms within Poland in order to account for regional differences in particular between metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions. The analysis at aggregated NUTS3 level does not bring satisfactory results. The difference between metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions is statistically insignificant and the overall results are mixed. In the second step, we apply more sophisticated econometric methods controlling for firm-specific, sector-specific and region-specific features as suggested in the literature of the subject identifying the positive effect of location within metropolitan regions on the innovative performance of companies. Furthermore, the results point to the significance of firm-specific, internal, as well as region-specific – factors external to a firm, nonetheless, supporting the notion of regional innovation systems in which firms are embedded.
Keywords: innovation; regional innovation system; regional economic performance; firm-level; logit model; Poisson model; negative binomial model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O30 R11 R12 R58 C21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-cse, nep-eur, nep-geo, nep-ino, nep-sbm, nep-tid, nep-tra and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://gnu.univ.gda.pl/~keie/aio42.pdf First version, 2017
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gda:wpaper:1701
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division from The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121, 81-824 Sopot, Poland. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tomasz Brodzicki ().